Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Visit old site
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 661


 
 Table of Contents  
RESEARCH LETTER
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 492-495

Clinical and bacteriological aspects of pyoderma


1 Department of Microbiology, G. R. Medical College, Gwalior, India
2 Department of Medicine, G. R. Medical College, Gwalior, India

Date of Web Publication4-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
K P Ranjan
Department of Microbiology, G. R. Medical College, Gwalior
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.101997

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Gandhi S, Ojha A K, Ranjan K P, Neelima. Clinical and bacteriological aspects of pyoderma. North Am J Med Sci 2012;4:492-5

How to cite this URL:
Gandhi S, Ojha A K, Ranjan K P, Neelima. Clinical and bacteriological aspects of pyoderma. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 May 28];4:492-5. Available from: http://www.najms.org/text.asp?2012/4/10/492/101997

Pyoderma is one of the commonest clinical conditions encountered in dermatological practice. [1] Primary pyodermas are impetigo, follicultis, furuncle, carbuncle, ecthyma, erthyrasma, and sycosis barbae. Secondary pyodermas constitute tropic ulcer, infected pemphigus, infected contact dermatitis, infected scabies, and various other dermatoses infected with organisms. Various factors like poverty, malnutrition, overcrowding, and poor hygiene have been stated to be responsible for its higher incidence in the lower socio-economic class. Climatic conditions also play a major role. [2] Changing trends are being noted in the etiological aspects of primary pyoderma, and the problem of emergence of drug resistance strains is an even increasing one. Most common organism usually isolated in pyoderma is Staphyloccus aureus, which may be either methicilllin-sensitive (MSSA) or methicilllin-resistant (MRSA). MRSA is an important health care associated pathogen. Many of these isolates are becoming multidrug resistant. All β-lactams including carbapenams and high-end cephalosporins, piperacillin, tazobactum etc. are ineffective against MRSA. Knowledge of prevalence of MRSA and their current anti-microbial profile becomes necessary in the selection of appropriate empirical treatment of these infections. [3] Here, we report the clinical and bacteriological aspects of the pyodermas to guide for the selection of appropriate antibiotics and to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms. We found that the incidence of impetigo was maximum among pyoderma. The primary pyoderma cases were maximum in the age group of < 10 years, and prevalence rate was higher in male patients. Among the various diseases, scabies was found to be the commonest to be associated with primary pyoderma. Most common isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Pyodermas are a common cause of skin infection in children and are associated with many multidrug-resistant organisms such as MRSA. A correct anti-microbial policy based on the knowledge of resistance patterns of the commonly isolated organisms is mandatory to prevent unnecessary medication and further emergence of drug-resistant organisms.

The study was conducted in the department of Microbiology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, MP, India. A total of 200 patients were selected for study from department of Skin and VD, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior from January 2009 to December 2010. Comprehensive history was taken along with physical and dermatological examination for all the patients. Patients with skin lesion with formation of pus were included and patients with lesion without pus were excluded for the study. All the samples were collected aseptically with two sterile cotton swabs for each sample from the lesion, which were processed for isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens, according to the standard microbiological techniques. [4] Gram stain preparations were made from one swab, and culture plates were inoculated from another swab. Each sample was inoculated on blood agar, MacConkey agar, and mannitol salt agar. All the above media and reagents were obtained from HiMedia, Mumbai, India. The media were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours in an incubator. The plates were observed for growth the following day but incubation was extended to 48 hours if there was no bacterial growth within 24 hours. Isolated colonies were subjected to Gram staining and biochemical tests for identification. Identification was carried out according to the standard biochemical tests. [4]

Anti-microbial susceptibility test was carried out on isolated and identified colonies using commercially prepared antibiotic disk (HiMedia) on Mueller Hinton agar plates by the disk diffusion method, according to the Central Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. [5],[6] Antibiotics used in our study were amoxycillin (100 μg), amoxyclav (20 μg), cefexime (5 μg), ceftrixone (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), cefoperazone/sulbactam (75/10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), doxycyclin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), and vancomycin (30 μg). MRSA detection was done using oxacillin disc (1 μg), and using Mueller Hinton agar with 2% NaCl. The plates were incubated for 24 hours at 35°C, and zone diameter was measured. If zone diameter was ≥13 mm, it was considered as MSSA and if it was ≤10mm, then it was considered as MRSA. [5]

Out of 200 cases of pyoderma, impetigo constituted 106 (53%) cases, superficial folliculitis 78 (39%) cases, furunculosis 13 (6.5%) cases, and carbuncle 3 (1.5%) cases, respectively [Table 1]. The frequency of cases in relation to age is shown in [Table 2]. The number of cases were maximum in the age group of less than 10 years (48%), followed by the age group of 21-30 years (21%), 11-20 years (17%), 31-40 years (09%), 51-60 years (2.5%), 41-50 years (1.5%), and > 60 years (0.5%). We also correlated the relationship between pyoderma and sex. The prevalence rate was higher in male (61.2%) patients compared with females (38.5%). Among the various diseases that were found to be associated with primary pyoderma, scabies was seen to be commonest in 17 (8.5%) cases. The other diseases in descending order of cases were vitiligo 3 (1.5%), diabetes mellitus 2 (1%), dermatophytosis 2 (1%), acne 1 (0.5%), and molluscum contagiosum 1 (0.5) [Table 3]. The study of body-wise distribution of pyoderma revealed that lower extremities were the most often affected site (60%), followed by head (47.5%), upper extremities (21.5%), and trunk (12.5%), respectively. The low socio-economic class was seen to be very commonly affected in 131 (65.5%) cases. The middle class was affected in only 60 (30%) while 9 (4.5%) cases belonged to the upper class. Out of 200 specimens, most common isolated organism was S. aureus (155, 77.5%), followed by β-hemolytic Steptococci (6, 3%), Klebsiella spp. (10, 5%), E. coli (6, 3%), and P. aeruginosa (4, 2%). There was no growth in 19 (9.5%) samples [Table 4]. The study of the individual pyoderma in relation to the causative organisms revealed that impetigo (106 cases) was found to be caused by S. aureus (86) followed by β-hemolytic Steptococci (05), Klebsiella spp. (02),  Escherichia More Details coli (02), P. aeruginosa (01), and sterile (10). Superficial follicultis (78) was found to be caused by S. aureus (56) followed by β-hemolytic Steptococci (01), Klebsiella spp (07), E. coli (04), P. aeruginosa (03), and 7 samples showed no growth. S. aureus was again the most common organism for furuncle. Furuncle (13) was found to be caused by S. aureus (10) followed by Klebsiella spp (01), and only 2 samples showed no growth. All the 3 cases of carbuncle showed yield of S. aureus.
Table 1: Sex distribution of the primary pyoderma

Click here to view
Table 2: Age distribution of the primary pyoderma

Click here to view
Table 3: Distributions of associated diseases with pyoderma

Click here to view
Table 4: Bacteriological analysis of the primary pyoderma

Click here to view


In our study, S. aureus was sensitive to vancomycin (99.35%) followed by ceftriaxone (99.19%), cefoperzone/sulbactum (99.19%), gentamicin (96.77%), amoxyclav (94.35%), doxycyclin (89.5%), ciprofloxacin (74.19%), cefuroxime (60%), erythromycin (58.06%), co-trimoxazole (50.32%), amoxicillin (34.84%), and cefixime (40%) respectively. Among the gram-negative bacteria, most isolates showed resistance to cefepime (80%), amoxicillin (75%), and cotrimoxazole (50%). Seventy percent of isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin and doxycycline. Out of 155 isolates of S. aureus, 124 (80%) were methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and 31 (20%) were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). When comparing the different types of pyoderma and their association with MRSA, it was seen that out of 86 impetigo cases, 72 (83.72%) were MSSA and 14 isolates were MRSA, whereas out of 56 isolates of superficial folliculitis, MSSA found in 42 (75%) and MRSA in 14 (25%), 13 isolates of furunculosis, MSSA found in 7 (70%) and MRSA in 3 (30%), and all 3 isolates of carbuncles were MSSA. This data clearly indicates the increasing incidence of MRSA in cases from impetigo to furuncle i.e. 16.28%, 25%, and 30% respectively.

Pyoderma has become a significant cause of skin infections. When the natural defense system of the body breaks down due to trauma, after invasive procedures, or chemotherapy, the normally benign bacteria can cause infection. [3] Our study showed that the overall incidence of impetigo was maximum among pyoderma. Impetigo was mainly seen in first decade of life while the lesion of superficial folliculitis were found more in 2 nd and 3 rd decade of life. S. aureus was the most common causative agent in all types of primary pyoderma in this study. Maximum cases (53%) were of impetigo followed by superficial folliculitis (39%), furunculosis (6.5%), and carbuncle (1.5%) respectively. These findings are almost similar to Ghadage DP et al. who showed that the maximum cases included in their study were of impetigo (39%) followed by superficial folliculitis (13%), and carbuncle (1.5%), respectively. [7] Mathew et al. also concluded the same findings. [8] In contrast, Bhaskaran et al. found that superficial folliculitis (25.9%) was the most common pyoderma followed by impetigo (16.36%) and furunculosis (4%). [9] When factors such as age and sex of the patient were considered, we found the occurrence of pyoderma to be higher in males and in patients in the age group below 10 years. Lawrence et al. also observed in their study that children less than 5 years age had the greatest prevalence of lesions. [10] Recently, many authors also reported pyoderma to be more common in the first decade of life. [11],[12]

In the present study, it was found that the lower extremities were involved in 60% cases followed by head (47.5%), upper extremities (21.5%), and trunk (12.5%) respectively. These results follow the trends seen in the older studies. [8],[13],[14] In our study, culture showed growth of S. aureus (77.5%) followed by β-hemolytic Streptococi (3%), Klebsiella spp (5%), E. coli (3%), P. aeruginosa (2%), and 9.5% were sterile. Bhaskaran et al. also reported 48.6% incidence of S. aureus. [9] Ghadage et al. and Parikh et al. found S. aureus in 67% and 97% cases, respectively. [7],[15] S. aureus was sensitive to vancomycin (99.35%) followed by ceftriaxone (99.19%), cefoperzone/sulbactum (99.19%), gentamicin (96.77%), amoxyclav (94.35%), doxycyclin (89.5%), ciprofloxacin (74.19%), cefuroxime (60%), erythromycin (58.06%), co-trimoxazole (50.32%), amoxicillin (34.84%), and cefixime (40%) respectively. Thus, overall, it has been found to be more sensitive to vancomycin, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, and amoxyclav. Widespread amoxicillin and cefixime resistance have emerged due to their extensive use and the emergence of penicillinase producing strains. Ramana et al. also reported that S. aureus was 100% sensitive to vancomycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and 81% and 8% sensitive to cefdinir and ampicillin, respectively. [16] Many reports from India and Asia have highlighted the prevalence of MRSA in the hospital- as well as community-acquired pyoderma. In present study, methicillin sensitivity was done by oxacillin disc examination. MSSA and MRSA were found in 80% and 20% cases, respectively, of S. aureus isolates. Nagaraja et al. reported an isolation rate of MRSA as 10.9% from community-acquired infection in India. [17] However, Qureshi et al. from Pakistan reported a high isolation rate of up to 83% MRSA from pus samples. [18]

In conclusion, primary pyoderma most commonly affected children in their first decade of life, and males were more affected than females. The cases were commonly from the lower socio-economic strata of society. Lower limbs were more commonly affected site, and scabies was the most common associated diseases. S. aureus was the commonest causative agent, and the emergence of MRSA in the community is a warning. A correct antibiotic policy and the avoidance of inappropriate anti-microbial usage are mandatory to reduce the spread of MRSA in the community.

 
  References Top

1.Singh Th N, Singh Th N, Devi Kh S, Singh Ng B. Bacteriological study of pyoderma in RIMS hospital. JMS - Journal of Medical Society 2005;19:109-12.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Roberts SO, Highet AS. Bacterial Infections: Textbook of Dermatology, 5 th ed. Oxford University Press; Blackwell 1996. p. 725-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Arora B, Ranjan KP, Arora DR. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in post operative wound infections in a referral hospital in Haryana, India. Infect Dis Antimicrob Agents 2008;25:123-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Orbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Pseudomonas, burkholderia, and similar organisms. In: Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, editors. Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 11 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2002. p. 448-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Central Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests, Approved standards 10 th ed., 2010. CLSI document M100-S20, Vol 29, No.3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Baird D. Staphylococcus: Cluster-forming gram positive cocci. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney practical medical microbiology. 14 th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 245-61.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Ghadage DP, Sali YA. Bacteriological study of pyoderma with special reference to antibiotic susceptibility to newer antibiotics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1999;65:177-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
8.Mathews MS, Garg BR, Kanungo R. A clinico-bacteriological study of primary pyodermas in children in Pondicherry. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1992;58:183-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Bhaskaran CB, Syamasundara PR. Bacteriological study of pyoderma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1989;45:162-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lawrence JN, Facklam RR, Sttneck FO. Epidemiologic studies among Amerdician population of Amazonia. Pyoderma prevalence and associated pathogens. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1989;28:54-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Nagmoti JM, Patil CS, Metgud SC. A bacterial study of pyoderma in Belgaum. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1999;65:69-71.  Back to cited text no. 11
  Medknow Journal  
12.Thind P, Prakash SK, Wadhwa A, Garg VK, Pati B. Bacteriological profile of community-acquired pyodermas with special reference to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:572-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.Kar PK, Sharma NP, Shah BH. Bacteriological study of pyoderma in children. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1985;5:325-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Patil R, Baveja S, Nataraj G, Khopkar U. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in community-acquired primary pyoderma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:126-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Parikh DA, Fernandez RJ, Wagle UD. Clinical and bacteriological aspects of pyoderma. J Postgrad Med 1987;33:189-92.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Ramana KV, Mohanty SK, Kumar A. In-vitro activities of current antimicrobial agents against isolates of pyoderma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:430.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Nagaraja V, Bhat GK, Kuruvila M, Peri GS, Jayalakshmi, Babu RP. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in community acquired pyoderma. Int J Dermatol 2004;42:412-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Qureshi AH, Rafi S, Qureshi SM, Ali AM. The current susceptibility patterns of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus to conventional anti Staphylococcus antimicrobials at Rawalpindi. Pak J Med Sci 2004;20:361-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 A therapeutic polyelectrolyte–vitamin C nanoparticulate system in polyvinyl alcohol–alginate hydrogel: An approach to treat skin and soft tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Liya George,M.C. Bavya,K Vimal Rohan,R. Srivastava
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2017; 160: 315
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1859    
    Printed54    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded344    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal