Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Visit old site
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 127


 
 Table of Contents  
COMMENTARY
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 404

Trigger finger


Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Discipline of Hand and Upper Limb Surgery, UNIFESP - Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo City, São Paulo, Brazil

Date of Web Publication14-Sep-2012

Correspondence Address:
Edson S Sato
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Discipline of Hand and Upper Limb Surgery, UNIFESP - Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo City, São Paulo
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 23050251

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sato ES. Trigger finger. North Am J Med Sci 2012;4:404

How to cite this URL:
Sato ES. Trigger finger. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 18];4:404. Available from: http://www.najms.org/text.asp?2012/4/9/404/100990

I believe that percutaneous trigger finger release is a safe method. Many studies proved it.

We performed a randomized study in 150 trigger fingers. The study evaluated the effectiveness of CS injection, percutaneous pulley release and conventional open surgery for treating trigger finger in terms of cure, relapse and complication rates. [1],[2]

We did not observe any lesion of the digital nerve among the three treatment groups, which would be a distressing factor, principally for the percutaneous method group. We believe that the demarcation of the longitudinal axis of the tendon in the percutaneous technique and precise anatomical knowledge of the pulleys are important factors for preventing complications, which is similar to the conclusion reached in anatomical studies. [3],[4],[5]

The percutaneous and open surgery methods displayed similar effectiveness and proved superior to the conservative CS method regarding the trigger cure and relapse rates.

 
  References Top

1.Sato ES, Albertoni WM, Leite VM. Trigger finger: A prospective analysis of 76 fingers treated surgically by percutaneous release. Rev Bras Ortop 2004;396:309-22.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Sato ES, Gomes Dos Santos JB, Belloti JC, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F. Treatment of trigger finger: Randomized clinical trial comparing the methods of corticosteroid injection, percutaneous release and open surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:93-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: An office procedure. J Hand Surg Am 1992;17:114-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Wilhelmi BJ, Mowlavi A, Neumeister MW, Bueno R, Lee WP. Safe treatment of trigger finger with longitudinal and transverse landmarks: An anatomic study of the border fingers for percutaneous release. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:993-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Fiorini HJ, Santos JB, Hirakawa CK, Sato ES, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM. Anatomical study of the A1 pulley: Length and location by means of cutaneous landmarks on the palmar surface. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:464-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1094    
    Printed64    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded249    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal