|
 
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2015 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 7 | Page : 306-309 |
|
Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease
Ranjan Pathak1, Dilli Ram Poudel1, Paras Karmacharya1, Amrit Pathak2, Madan Raj Aryal1, Maryam Mahmood1, Anthony A Donato1
1 Department of Medicine, Reading Health System, West Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
2 Department of Medicine, Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| Date of Web Publication | 21-Jul-2015 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ranjan Pathak
Reading Health System, 6th Ave and Spruce St, West Reading, Pennsylvania-19611
USA
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.161244
Background: The current West Africa epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD), which began from Guinea in December 2013, has been the longest and deadliest Ebola outbreak to date. With the propagation of the internet, public health officials must now compete with other official and unofficial sources of information to get their message out. Aims: This study aimed at critically appraising videos available on one popular internet video site (YouTube) as a source of information for Ebola virus disease (EVD). Materials and Methods: Videos were searched in YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) using the keyword "Ebola outbreak" from inception to November 1, 2014 with the default "relevance" filter. Only videos in English language under 10 min duration within first 10 pages of search were included. Duplicates were removed and the rest were classified as useful or misleading by two independent reviewers. Video sources were categorized by source. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated with kappa coefficient. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using the Student t-test and Chi-squared test, respectively. Results: One hundred and eighteen out of 198 videos were evaluated. Thirty-one (26.27%) videos were classified as misleading and 87 (73.73%) videos were classified as useful. The kappa coefficient of agreement regarding the usefulness of the videos was 0.68 (P < 0.001). Independent users were more likely to post misleading videos (93.55% vs 29.89%, OR = 34.02, 95% CI = 7.55-153.12, P < 0.001) whereas news agencies were most likely to post useful videos (65.52% vs 3.23%, OR = 57.00, 95% CI = 7.40-438.74, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that majority of the internet videos about Ebola on YouTube were characterized as useful. Although YouTube seems to generally be a useful source of information on the current outbreak, increased efforts to disseminate scientifically correct information is desired to prevent unnecessary panic among the among the general population. Keywords: Ebola, information, YouTube, videos
How to cite this article:
Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, Pathak A, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, Donato AA. Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. North Am J Med Sci 2015;7:306-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, Pathak A, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, Donato AA. Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 9];7:306-9. Available from: http://www.najms.org/text.asp?2015/7/7/306/161244 |
| Introduction | |  |
The current West Africa epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD), which began from Guinea in December 2013, has been the longest and deadliest Ebola outbreak to date. [1] Ebola's method of transmission makes it amenable to containment by coordinated efforts from the public health community worldwide. [2] Those efforts include measures to keep citizens informed to prevent further spread and undue panic. [3] However, with the propagation of the internet, public health officials must now compete with other official and unofficial sources of information to get their message out. In view of these concerns, we attempted to critically appraise videos available on one popular internet video site (YouTube) as a source of information for EVD.
| Materials and Methods | | |
We searched YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) for videos using the keyword "Ebola outbreak" from inception to November 1, 2014 using the default "relevance" filter. The term "Ebola outbreak" was selected as the search term after sampling around 50 YouTube videos related to the Ebola outbreak. We included English language videos with primary content related to EVD with ≤10 min duration and restricted the search results to the first 10 pages [Figure 1]. Duplicate videos, videos without accompanying audio or >10 min duration were excluded. Two independent reviewers classified videos as useful (containing scientifically correct information about any aspect of the disease: epidemiology, symptoms, treatment, prevention) or misleading (containing at least one scientifically unproven information, e. g., EVD as man-made conspiracy or depopulation strategy) using a previously validated method. [4] We extracted the title, length, number of views, number of likes/dislikes, author and date uploaded for the videos. Video sources were also categorized into seven groups (viz. CDC, WHO, Red Cross, NGO/INGOs, academic health institutions/hospitals, news agencies and independent users). Inter-observer agreement was evaluated with kappa coefficient. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using the Student t-test and Chi-squared test, respectively. A two tailed P - value of <0.05 was considered signifýcant. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for the data analyses. | Figure 1: Flow chart showing systematic video search and selection process
Click here to view |
| Results | | |
Of the 198 videos screened, 118 videos met the inclusion criteria. 31 (26.27%) videos were classified as misleading and 87 (73.73%) videos were classified as useful. The kappa coefficient of agreement regarding the usefulness of the videos was 0.68 (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of views, mean number of likes, mean number of days on YouTube between the two groups [Table 1]. The mean length of videos classified as misleading was longer than those classified as useful (6.44 vs 4.11 minutes, P < 0.001). Independent users were more likely to post misleading videos (93.55% vs 29.89%, OR = 34.02, 95% CI = 7.55-153.12, P < 0.001) whereas news agencies were most likely to post useful videos (65.52% vs 3.23%, OR = 57.00, 95% CI = 7.40-438.74, P < 0.001) [Table 1]. Examples of fallacious statements recorded from the misleading videos are given in [Supplementary Table 1 [Additional file 1] ]. | Table 1: Detailed characteristics of the misleading and useful youtube videos analyzed
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
Our study shows that majority of the internet videos about Ebola on YouTube were characterized as useful. The popularity of the videos (as measured by number of views and likes/day) between misleading and useful videos was similar. Studies in the past on the role of YouTube as a source of information for H 1 N 1 influenza [4] and immunization [5] have found similar results. Most videos uploaded from news agencies contained correct scientific information. The WHO and CDC were under-represented in the identified video collection (although often quoted in news agency videos) suggesting that those groups do not have immediate primary access to a majority of internet users who use YouTube as a source of information.
| Conclusion | | |
Although YouTube seems to generally be a useful source of information on the current outbreak, official health agencies should redouble their efforts to disseminate scientifically correct information on Ebola on sites such as YouTube and prevent unnecessary panic among the general population.
| References | | |
| 1. | Briand S, Bertherat E, Cox P, Formenty P, Kieny MP, Myhre JK, et al. The international Ebola emergency. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1180-3.  |
| 2. | Gostin LO, Lucey D, Phelan A. The ebola epidemic: A global health emergency. JAMA 2014;312:1095-6. |
| 3. | Gonsalves G, Staley P. Panic, paranoia, and public health - the aids epidemic's lessons for Ebola. N Engl J Med 2014;371:2348-9. |
| 4. | Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:e1-3. |
| 5. | Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: A content analysis. JAMA 2007;298:2482-4. [ PUBMED] |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube |
|
| Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu,Abdulcabbar Kartal,Ugur Ekici,Alp Gurkan | | Obesity Surgery. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media |
|
| Yuxi Wang,Martin McKee,Aleksandra Torbica,David Stuckler | | Social Science & Medicine. 2019; : 112552 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Precision Global Health – The case of Ebola: a scoping review |
|
| Nefti-Eboni Bempong,Rafael Ruiz De Castañeda,Stefanie Schütte,Isabelle Bolon,Olivia Keiser,Gérard Escher,Antoine Flahault | | Journal of Global Health. 2019; 9(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Information for Diabetic Foot Care |
|
| Peter E. Smith,James McGuire,Michael Falci,Dilli Ram Poudel,Richard Kaufman,Mary Ann Patterson,Benjamin Pelleschi,Esther Shin | | Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2019; 109(2): 122 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Comparison of New Era’s Education Platforms, YouTube® and WebSurg®, in Sleeve Gastrectomy |
|
| Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu,Abdulcabbar Kartal,Ali Ilker Filiz,Abut Kebudi | | Obesity Surgery. 2019; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Social media and outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases: A systematic review of literature |
|
| Lu Tang,Bijie Bie,Sung-Eun Park,Degui Zhi | | American Journal of Infection Control. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Challenges of Vaccinations in the Era of New Media Communication |
|
| Minsoo Jung | | The Health Care Manager. 2018; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Harnessing Big Data for Communicable Tropical and Sub-Tropical Disorders: Implications From a Systematic Review of the Literature |
|
| Vincenza Gianfredi,Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,Daniele Nucci,Mariano Martini,Roberto Rosselli,Liliana Minelli,Massimo Moretti | | Frontiers in Public Health. 2018; 6 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Zika Virus on YouTube: An Analysis of English-language Video Content by Source |
|
| Corey H. Basch,Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,Rodney N. Hammond,Elizabeth B. Blankenship,Zion Tsz Ho Tse,King-Wa Fu,Patrick Ip,Charles E. Basch | | Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 50(2): 133 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
Alzheimer’s Disease in Social Media: Content Analysis of YouTube Videos |
|
| Weizhou Tang,Kate Olscamp,Seul Ki Choi,Daniela B Friedman | | Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2017; 6(2): e19 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
Qualitative analysis of Parkinson’s disease information on social media: the case of YouTube™ |
|
| Ibrahim Saleh Al-Busaidi,Tim J. Anderson,Yassar Alamri | | EPMA Journal. 2017; 8(3): 273 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
Ebola virus disease and social media: A systematic review |
|
| Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,Carmen Hope Duke,Kathryn Cameron Finch,Kassandra Renee Snook,Pei-Ling Tseng,Ana Cristina Hernandez,Manoj Gambhir,King-Wa Fu,Zion Tsz Ho Tse | | American Journal of Infection Control. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
Social Mediaæs Initial Reaction to Information and Misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and Rumors |
|
| Isaac Chun-Hai Fung,King-Wa Fu,Chung-Hong Chan,Benedict Shing Bun Chan,Chi-Ngai Cheung,Thomas Abraham,Zion Tsz Ho Tse | | Public Health Reports. 2016; 131(3): 461 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for