Case Report

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Wei-Jun Wang1, Jia-Gen Li1, Zhi-Tao Li1, Qian Fang1, Yan-Guo Zheng2

1Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and 2Department of Anesthesiology

Wenzhou Medical College Wenling Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China

Background: A laparoscopic surgery can be beneficial in a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Aims: This report shows a 60-year-old woman who presented to her persistent upper abdominal and bilateral lumbodorsal distending pain for one year. A computed tomography scan demonstrated a 4cm×5cm×5cm solid space-occupying mass in the distal pancreas. The patient was referred to minimally invasive surgery service for resection of the pancreatic lesion. Methods: A laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was performed. Results: The mass was completely excised, the pathological examination revealed pancreatic adenocarcinoma with grade II. The postoperative advantages of this approach were the early return of bowel function, minimal complications, and early resumption of normal activities. Conclusions: This case illustrates that minimally invasive surgery in the performance of a spleen-and-splenic-vessel preserving distal pancreatectomy is a feasible procedure without compromising the splenic function. (Wang WJ, Li JG, Li ZT, Fang Q, Zheng YG. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. North Am J Med Sci 2009; 1: 25-27).

Key words: Laparoscopy; pancreatectomy; distal pancreatectomy; pancreatic cancer; splenic vessels; adenocarcinoma; laparoscopic spleen-preserving; space-occupying; pancreas.

Correspondence to: Dr. Wei-Jun Wang, MD. Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Wenzhou Medical College Wenling Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China. E-Mail: wwj5558@yahoo.com.cn.

Introduction

A 60-year-old woman presented with persistent upper abdominal and bilateral lumbodorsal distending pain for one year. On examination, no positive abdominal sign was found. A computed tomography (CT) scan was ordered, and a 4cm×5cm×5cm solid space-occupying mass was observed in the distal pancreas (Fig. 1). The patient was referred to our center and scheduled for a laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Materials and Methods

After entering the operating room, the patient was placed in the supine position on the operating table. After induction of general endtracheal anesthesia, the abdomen was accessed using a 12mm Optiview trocar (Ethicon Endosurgery Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio) below umbilicus. A pneumoperitoneum was created using 13 mmHg insufflations of carbon dioxide. Three trocars were positioned on the right midclavicular line 3-4cm below costal margin, right and left anterior axillary lines below costal margin, respectively. The patient was placed in 30° reverse Trendelenburg and rolled 15° to her right side.

A laparoscope was used to survey the abdomen. The body and tail of the pancreas are exposed by opening the lesser sac. The gastrocolonic, gastrosplenic and partial splenocolonic ligaments were divided with an ultrasonic scalpel, followed by resection of the short gastric vessels. After exposure of the pancreas, the tumor was visualized. Next, the splenic artery was carefully mobilized in superior margin of the pancreas, and the dissection between the pancreas and splenic vessel was continued in inferior margin of the pancreas. Following the creation of a sufficient posterior window, the body of the pancreas was transected with 60mm Endo-GIA. The distal part of pancreas was further mobilized. The resected mass was placed in a bag and brought through the laparoscope port incision. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed at the distal pancreatic bed and brought out through the left posterior port incision.

Resutls

Operative time was 210min with total blood loss of 400 cc. Bowel function returned on postoperative 48h, and normal activity was resumed by postoperative 72h. The Jackson-Pratt drain was removed on postoperative day 5. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. The pathology revealed a completely excised pancreatic adenocarcinoma with grade II.

A CT scan obtained three weeks after surgery showed no evidence of fluid collection or spleen infarction with well-preserved blood flow in the remaining splenic artery and splenic vein. The patient has been followed up for 4.5 months so far after surgery and shown no evidence of recurrence.

Discussion

With the improvement in laparoscopic instrumentations and the maturity of technical procedure, increasing laparoscopic pancreatic surgeries have been performed, however, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the both spleen and splenic vessels is highly challenging and susceptible to complications, including intraoperative hemorrhage and pancreatic leakage, few cases were reported so far in the laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels [1].

The indication for laparoscopic resection of pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Previous studies indicate that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is mainly for benign distal pancreatic tumor [2], while some study shows that indication for laparoscopic distal pancreatic surgeries is similar to the traditional open procedure [3]. In our point of view, laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is only one of many techniques that may be employed to treat the lesions of the pancreatic body or tail. As long as the operator has enough experience with performance of the open-procedure and laparoscopic skill, the indications for laparoscopic therapy should be widen. That is, it should be preformed whenever the technique is available.

Pancreatic cancer continues to be a major source of cancer mortality. There were 33,370 deaths attributable to this disease in 2007 in the United States [4]. In fact, mortality rate almost approximates the annual incidence rate, which reflects the generally short survival time associated with pancreatic cancer, most often less than one year [4]. The patients can either be asymptomatic or have unspecific symptoms such as anorexia, weight loss and abdominal pain. The CT scan serves as the primary imaging study for most patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Less invasive options may include aspiration and biopsy, observation of the cysts, particularly serous collections, or enucleation of small cysts or islet lesions.

With regard to distal pancreatectomy, the spleen can be resected en bloc or preserved. Increasing awareness of splenic function and its role in the immunologic defense system has driven the trend of splenic preservation in association with distal pancreatectomy. Splenic preservation is primary strategy of each surgeon’s before the procedure. Shoup et al. [5] analyzed a series 79 distal pancreatectomies, 46 with splenic preservation, concluding that spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy was associated with lower rates of infectious and serious complications. Therefore, splenic salvage should be performed whenever technically possible to decrease the morbidity of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Splenic preservation can be accomplished via either dissection or preservation of the splenic artery and vein. Kinura et al [6] in 1996 was the first to report laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic artery and vein. This is technically challenging with longer operative times and greater potential for bleeding. To minimize those risks, Warshaw et al [7] advocated dissection of the splenic artery and vine with preservation of the short gastric and left gastroepiploic vessels. This simplified the procedure, but splenic infarction occurred frequently. This outcome was confirmed by Demanded-Cruz et al [8], who purposely compared the two procedures by following up 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of spleen (11 cases with Kinura’ procedure and 8 with Warshaw’s procedure) and concluded 3 cases associated with postoperative splenic infarction, all with Warshaw’s procedure.

As shown in our case, important technical details in the distal pancreatectomy with preservation of spleen include dissection of the pancreas and preservation of the splenic vessels. Even though it is technically challenging with longer operative time and greater potential for bleeding, in our experience, the pancreas and splenic vessels are identified early in the dissection, in order to assure hemostatic control in the event that the subsequent dissection results in inadvertent bleeding. Therefore, preservation of splenic vessels is a relatively safe and feasible in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of spleen [9].

Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy is a topic of ongoing debate and the major source of postoperative morbidity. The previously reported literatures indicated 11~16% of pancreatic leakage (5%~23%) [3, 8-10]. Management of pancreatic stump is critical to prevent pancreatic fistula. Major issues regarding the application of this approach include the optimal visualization with the use of the laparoscopic retractor.

In conclusions, our experience suggests that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen and splenic vessels is a feasible option for lesions in the distal pancreas with many benefits, including less invasive, more rapid in recovery and lesser complication. However, long-term outcome of this technique for patients with proven malignancy should be investigated further.

References

1. Edwin B, Mala T, Mathisen O, Glahaug I, Buanes T, Lunde OC, Soreide O, Bergan A, Fosse E. Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas a feasibility study of the short-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 407-411.

2. Dai MH, Zhao YP, Liao Q, Liu ZW, Guo JC, Cong L. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: current indications and surgical results. Chin J Surg 2006; 44: 1022-1025.

3. White SA, Sutton CD, Weymss-Holden S, Berry DP, Pollard C, Rees Y, Dennison AR. The feasibility of spleen-preserving pancreatectomy for end-stage chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 294-297.

5. Shoupe M, Brennan MF. The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 164-168.

6. Kinura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, Shinkai H, Han I, Muto T. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery 1996; 120:885-890.

7. Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 1998; 123:550-553.

8. Femandez-Cruz L, Martinez I, Gilabert R, Cesar-Borges G, Astudillo E, Navarro S. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combined with preservation of the spleen for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8:493-501.

9. Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 183:237-241.