|
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2016 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 5 | Page : 210-214 |
|
Coexistence of her2, ki67, and p53 in osteosarcoma: A strong prognostic factor
Keykhosro Mardanpour1, Mahtab Rahbar2, Sourena Mardanpour3
1 Kermanshah Medical University, Kermanshah, Iran 2 Medical University, Tehran, Iran 3 Azad Medical University, Tehran, Iran
Date of Web Publication | 26-May-2016 |
Correspondence Address: Mahtab Rahbar Associated professor of Pathology Department, Iran Medical University Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.183013
Background: Many laboratories are currently evaluating the usefulness of the determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), p53, and Ki67 proliferation indices using immunohistochemical techniques in cancer. Although the available studies suggest that these factors might indeed be helpful in making treatment decisions in osteosarcoma patients, their clinical usefulness is still controversial. Aims: We proposed to introduce the value of the coexistence of HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 in osteosarcoma, which could be a prognostic factor in osteosarcoma. Material and Methods: Expression of HER2, p53, and Ki67 was examined by immunohistochemistry in samples of resected bone tumor tissue from 56 patients with osteosarcoma, obtained between 2009 and 2014 (median follow-up period of 48 months), and their significance for prognosis was analyzed. Results: Of the 56 osteogenic sarcoma tissue samples, 80, 89, and 96.5% were positive for HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 expression, respectively. Overexpression of HER2 and accumulation of p53 protein significantly correlated with reduced disease-free (P < 0.01) and overall survival (P < 0.003). HER2 and Ki67 co-overexpression significantly correlated with decreased disease-free (P < 0.03) and overall survival (P < 0.02). HER2, accumulation of p53 protein, and Ki67 co-overexpression significantly correlated with reduced disease-free (P < 0.01) and overall survival (P < 0.005) as did patients with larger tumor size, high grade of tumor, positive lymph node, and metastasis status within the specified period of follow up. Conclusions: We found evidence that coexistence of HER2 and Ki67 overexpression and p53 protein accumulation predict the development of lymph node involvement and metastases in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma and were significantly associated with reduced survival. Keywords: HER2, immunohistochemistry, Ki67, osteosarcoma, p53, prognosis
How to cite this article: Mardanpour K, Rahbar M, Mardanpour S. Coexistence of her2, ki67, and p53 in osteosarcoma: A strong prognostic factor. North Am J Med Sci 2016;8:210-4 |
How to cite this URL: Mardanpour K, Rahbar M, Mardanpour S. Coexistence of her2, ki67, and p53 in osteosarcoma: A strong prognostic factor. North Am J Med Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 May 30];8:210-4. Available from: https://www.najms.org/text.asp?2016/8/5/210/183013 |
Introduction | |  |
Osteosarcoma is the most common human primary bone malignancy, accounting for over 700 new diagnoses in the United States each year. Current multimodality therapy consists of radical surgery and systemic chemotherapy.[1],[2] Despite improvements in the outcome over the past 30 years for patients with local disease, the 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic disease at presentation or recurrent disease remains poor.[3] The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is expressed in up to 60% of primary osteosarcoma samples and correlates with poor outcome.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
The p53 protein is a critical tumor suppressor and central mediator of cellular responses to stress. Inactivating mutations of the p53 gene occur in 50% of all sporadic human cancers.[13] The mutation of p53 significantly correlates with genome-wide DNA instability and appears to represent a major genetic factor contributing to the extremely high levels of genomic instability found in high-grade osteosarcomas.[14]
Prognostic biomarkers such as HER2, p53, and Ki67 in a disease provide information regarding the outcome respective of therapy. Molecular events associated with disease aggressiveness and chemotherapy response may serve as prognostic factors. Tumor size, lymph node involvement, histologic grade of tumor, and initial metastasis are bad prognostic factors in osteosarcoma. The most important predictor of outcome at diagnosis is the presence or absence of metastases. In addition, the expression of HER2/neu may be a predictor of chemotherapy response and prognosis in osteosarcoma.[6],[7] For some authors, it shows a poor survival rate.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15]
We hypothesized that candidate prognostic biomarkers in osteosarcoma include elevated levels of expression of proliferation indices, such as Ki67, and amplification and overexpression of HER2 and p53 nuclear protein accumulation. Immunohistochemistry studies of osteosarcoma were planned to test the hypothesis.
Materials and Methods | |  |
In this study, patients' profiles were treated anonymously and the study was ethically approved by the Hospital's Local Committee after consenting to the voluntary participation of patients. We used tissue specimens from 56 patients with mean ± SD age of 26.44 ± 12.51 years (range 14–68 years) with osteogenic sarcoma. All patients had undergone bone tumor resection with safe surgical margins. Primary treatment for patients with low-grade osteogenic sarcoma only includes wide excision. Chemotherapy, either prior to excision or postoperatively, is not typically recommended.[16] Chemotherapy is warranted for all stages of high-grade osteogenic sarcomas. For metastatic osteosarcoma, 2–3 cycles of chemotherapy are typically given preoperatively; 3–4 cycles of chemotherapy are given postoperatively.[16]
Routinely, patients were observed for disease recurrence and death, at least once every 6 months, for about 5 years after surgery and yearly thereafter. For our patients, the mean ± SD follow-up period was 24 ± 3.75 months (range 18–52 months).
We examined the coexpression of HER2, p53, and Ki67 in samples of bone tumor biopsy of those patients who were diagnosed for osteosarcoma at Kermanshah Medical University Hospital between 2009 and 2014, and then analyzed their significance for prognosis.
One 4-µm section from each submitted paraffin block was first stained with hematoxylin and eosin in order to verify that an adequate number of malignant osteoblastic cells were present and that the quality of fixation was sufficient for immunohistochemical analysis. Serial sections (4-µm) were prepared from the selected blocks and float-mounted on adhesive-coated glass slides for HER2, p53, and Ki67 staining. Primary antibodies included rabbit antihuman c-erbB2 oncoprotein antibody (DAKO) at 1:200 dilution for HER2, monoclonal mouse antihuman p53 protein antibody (PAb1801; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) at 1:50 dilution for p53, and monoclonal mouse antihuman Ki67 antibody (MIB-1; DAKO) at 1:100 dilution for Ki67. The DAKO Envision system (DAKO Envisionlabelled polymer, peroxidase) was used as the detection system for HER2 and Ki67. The streptavidin-biotinsystem (SAB-PO kit; Nichirei Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was applied for the detection of the bound antibody of p53.
Immunostained slides were scored after the entire slide had been evaluated by light microscopy. For all specimens, negative control was adjacent non tumor of specimen and positive control was on kit of stain. HER2 immunostaining was evaluated using the same method as was employed by the HercepTest (DAKO). To determine the score of HER2 expression the membrane staining pattern was estimated and scored on a scale of 0 to 3+. Tumors with scores of 2 or greater were considered to be positive for HER2 overexpression. The expression status of p53 and Ki67 was assessed according to the estimated proportion of the nuclear staining of tumor cells that were positively stained. Scoring criteria for p53 were as follows (in the form of the proportion of nuclear staining = score): None = 0, <1/10 = 1, 1/10–1/2 = 2, and >1/2 = 3. Scoring criteria for Ki67 were as follows (in the form of the proportion of nuclear staining = score): None = 0, <1/100 = 1, 1/100–1/10 = 2, 1/10–1/2 = 3, and >1/2 = 4. Tumors with a score of 1 or greater for p53 were considered to be positive for p53 protein accumulation, and tumors with a score of 2 or greater for Ki67 were considered to be positive for Ki67 expression.
Statistical analysis
Collected data were documented using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics. Results were expressed as percentages, frequencies, and mean ± S.D. The Mann–Whitney U test, χ2 test, Pearson Chi-square test, or Spearman Rho test were performed for comparative statistical evaluations among groups and for correlation analysis with histological and clinical parameters (tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node involvement, metastasis rate, coexistence of HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, Ki67 expression, and postoperative survival). Survival periods were counted in months from the date of the first visit to date of death or last follow-up before study closure. We used Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the overall survival for low and high levels of HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 expression. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results | |  |
A total of 56 confirmed cases for osteosarcoma were admitted during the period of January 2009 to December 2014. The mean age of the study group was 26.94 ± 12.51 years with 39 males (70%) and 17 females (30%). The follow-up period was 24 ± 3.75 months (range 18–52 months) [Table 1]. | Table 1: Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with osteogenic sarcoma
Click here to view |
Of the 56 osteosarcoma tissue samples, 80, 89, and 96.5% were positive for HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 expression, respectively [Table 2]. | Table 2: Correlation between clinicopathologic factors and molecular markers
Click here to view |
HER2, P53, and Ki67 overexpression were significantly correlated with all clinicopathologic factors. Overexpression of HER2 was significantly associated with p53 protein accumulation (P < 0.02). In addition, a significant association was observed between expression status of p53 and that of Ki67 (P < 0.02). Moreover, a significant association was observed between expression status of HER2 and that of Ki67 (P < 0.03). [Figure 1] and [Table 3] | Figure 1: HER2, P53, and Ki67 overexpression in osteosarcoma. (a) Photomicrograph of osteosarcoma (hematoxylin and eosin). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed (b) Ki67 with 30% positivity, and (c) HER2 grade 3+ reactivity. (d) P53 demonstrating clusters of nuclei positivity of neoplastic cells
Click here to view |
Disease-free and overall survival was categorized by HER2, p53, and Ki67 expression. HER2 overexpression with P53 were associated with significantly reduced disease-free (<0.01) and overall survival (P = 0.05). Similarly, HER2 overexpression with ki67 were associated with significantly reduced disease-free (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.04). HER2 overexpression with P53 and ki67 were associated with significantly reduced disease-free (P < 0.02) and overall survival (P < 0.05). Both the disease-free and overall survival curves were similar between the tumors positive for HER2 overexpression with p53 protein accumulation and Ki67 expression together. The tumors of 38 patients were positive for both HER2 overexpression and p53 protein accumulation. The disease-free and overall survival curves demonstrate that these patients relapsed and died within a significantly shorter period of time after the surgery [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b (P < 0.01). The disease-free and overall survival curves for patients with HER2 or p53 positive tumors were different from those for patients with tumors that were negative for both HER2 and p53.
In our analysis [Table 4], combined HER2 and p53 status (P < 0.01) and Ki67 status (P < 0.02), as well as tumor size (P < 0.01), number of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.01), histological grade (P < 0.003) were strongly able to predict disease-free survival. There is no significant correlation between age or gender vs. all parameters. | Table 4: Prognostic factors in 56 osteosarcoma compared with disease free survival
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2a: Effect of coexistence of HER2 overexpression and p53 protein accumulation on (a) disease-free and (b) overall survival among 56 patients with osteosarcoma. Free and overall survival were significantly worse in patients with HER2 and p53-positive tumors than in patients with HER2 and p53-negative tumors and HER2 or p53 positive tumors (P = 0.01 for both)
Click here to view |
Discussion | |  |
The present study indicates that the coexistence of HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 expression has strong prognostic significance in osteosarcoma after a median follow-up period of 25 months. HER2/neu and p53 coexpression has been described in numerous human malignancies of the lung, stomach, breast, prostate and other tissues.[15],[17] HER2 encodes a 185-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein with intracellular tyrosine kinase activity that belongs to the HER family.[18] Although no ligand has been identified for HER2, several peptide growth factors bind to the other members of the family. Amplification or overexpression of HER2 is observed in 40% of osteosarcoma.[15] The expression of HER2/neu may be a predictor of chemotherapy response and prognosis in osteosarcoma. For some authors, it is correlated with a poor survival rate. In 1999, it was first suggested that there is correlation of HER2/neu expression with histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and event-free survival in osteosarcoma. Therefore, HER2/neu was introduced prospectively as a prognostic indicator.[19] Subsequently, over 10 studies have been reported in which the role of amplification/overexpression of HER2 was investigated as a prognostic marker in osteosarcoma.
In the present study, we extended our analysis of HER2 overexpression to 38 osteosarcoma, and showed that overexpression of HER2 was associated with poor prognosis. Similar to some other primary human tumors, the mutation of p53 correlates significantly with the presence of high levels of genomic instability in osteosarcomas. The p53 protein is a critical tumor suppressor and central mediator of cellular responses to stress. Inactivating mutations of the p53 gene occur in 50% of all sporadic human cancers.[13],[14],[15] The accumulation of p53 protein was significantly associated with poor prognosis in our study as well as in other studies of patients with osteosarcoma. These studies suggest both a prognostic and a predictive role for p53.[2] However, p53-positive staining was not associated with 3-year (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.84 to 3.20; P = 0.15; I2 = 56%) and 5-year survival (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.01; P = 0.36; I2 = 70%).[19] The data from the current study suggest that p53-positive osteosarcoma only predicted a decreased short-term survival rate within the specified period of follow up.
Both HER2 overexpression and p53 protein accumulation with Ki67 high expression were not reported.[20]
Conclusions | |  |
The coexistence of HER2 overexpression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 predict for the development of lymph node involvement and metastases in patients with osteosarcoma, and were significantly associated with a reduced survival within a follow-up period of 24 ± 3.75 months. Therefore, the coexistence of these markers is a strong prognostic factor in osteosarcoma.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Gurney JG, Swensen AR, Bulterys M. Malignant Bone Tumors. In: Ries LA, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al., editors. Cancer incidance and survival among children and adolescents: United state SEER Program 1975-1995. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. NIH Pub. No. 99-4649;1999. |
2. | Pizzo PA, Williams L, Wilkins. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 5 th ed. Philadelphia, USA; 2006. p. 1074-115. |
3. | Bacci G, Briccoli A, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, Faggioli F, et al. Treatment and outcome of recurrent osteosarcoma: Experience at Rizzoli in 235 patients initially treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 2005;44:748-55. |
4. | Flint AF, U'Ren L, Legare ME, Withrow SJ, Dernell W, Hanneman WH. Overexpression of the erbB-2 proto-oncogene in canine osteosarcoma cell lines and tumors. Vet Pathol 2004;41:291-6. |
5. | Gilbertson RJ. ERBB2 in pediatric cancer: Innocent until proven guilty. Oncologist 2005;10:508-17. |
6. | Ahmed N, Salsman VS, Yvon E, Louis CU, Perlaky L, Wels WS, et al. Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma: Genetic Modification of T cells Overcomes Low Levels of Tumor Antigen Expression. Mol Ther 2009;17:1779-87. |
7. | Hughes DP, Thomas DG, Giordano TJ, Baker LH, McDonagh KT. Cell surface expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and Her-2 with nuclear expression of Her-4 in primary osteosarcoma. Cancer Res 2004;64:2047-53. |
8. | Hughes DP, Thomas DG, Giordano TJ, McDonagh KT, Baker LH. Essential erbB family phosphorylation in osteosarcoma as a target for CI-1033 inhibition. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;46:614-23. |
9. | Morris CD, Gorlick R, Huvos G, Heller G, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 as a prognostic indicator in osteogenic sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;382:59-65. |
10. | Fellenberg J, Krauthoff A, Pollandt K, Delling G, Parsch D. Evaluation of the predictive value of Her-2/neu gene expression on osteosarcoma therapy in laser-microdissected paraffin-embedded tissue. Lab Invest 2004;84:113-21. |
11. | Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Zanella L, Setola E, Bacchini P, Alberghini M, et al. Evaluation of P-glycoprotein, HER-2/ErbB-2, p53, and Bcl-2 in primary tumor and metachronous lung metastases in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Cancer 2004;100:1936-42. |
12. | Zhou H, Randall RL, Brothman AR, Maxwell T, Coffin CM, Goldsby RE. Her-2/neu expression in osteosarcoma increases risk of lung metastasis and can be associated with gene amplification. J Pediatr Hemato Oncol 2003;25:27-32. |
13. | Olivier M, Hollstein M, Hainaut P. TP53 Mutations in human cancers: Origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010;2:a001008. |
14. | Ozaki T, Nakagawara A. Role of p53 in Cell Death and Human Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2011;3:994-1013. |
15. | Overholtzer M, Rao PH, Favis R, Lu XY, Elowitz MB, Barany F, et al. The presence of p53 mutations in human osteosarcomas correlates with high levels of genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:11547-52. |
16. | Geller DS, Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma: A review of diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2010;8:705-18. |
17. | Anne-Marie Capodano, Bone: Osteosarcoma, Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2003;7:45-8. |
18. | Boland JM, Kwon ED, Harrington SM, Wampfler JA, Tang H, Yang P, et al. Tumor B7-H1 and B7-H3 Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung. Clin Lung Cancer 2013;14:157-63. |
19. | Zang X, Thompson RH, Al-Ahmadie HA, Serio AM, Reuter VE, Eastham JA. B7-H3 and B7x are highly expressed in human prostate cancer and associated with disease spread and poor outcome. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2007;104:19458-63. |
20. | Gorlick R, Huvos AG, Heller G, Aledo A, Beardsley GP, Healey JH, et al. Expression of HER2/erbB-2 correlates with survival in osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:2781-8. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Management of osteosarcoma of the head and neck |
|
| Florida Sharin, Ameya Pai, Manish Mair | | Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery. 2023; Publish Ah | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 promotes osteosarcoma progression by regulating tumor-derived exosomal miRNA hsa-miR-23a-3p |
|
| Dan Yang, Yinxian Chen, Zhen Ning Tony He, Yichen Wang, Chenghui Ke, Yi Luo, Sun Wang, Qichao Ma, Mengjie Chen, Qing Yang, Ziming Zhang | | Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023; 14 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
Improving Osteosarcoma Treatment: Comparative Oncology in Action |
|
| Lidia Tarone, Katia Mareschi, Elisa Tirtei, Davide Giacobino, Mariateresa Camerino, Paolo Buracco, Emanuela Morello, Federica Cavallo, Federica Riccardo | | Life. 2022; 12(12): 2099 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
miR-135a Targets SMAD2 to Promote Osteosarcoma Proliferation and Migration |
|
| Yuanyuan Chen, Bin Cai, Xiaofeng Lian, Jianguang Xu, Tao Zhang, Wei long Zhong | | Journal of Oncology. 2022; 2022: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
Clinicopathological assessment of cancer/testis antigens NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 in osteosarcoma |
|
| Kazuhiko Hashimoto, Shunji Nishimura, Tomohiko Ito, Naohiro Oka, Ryosuke Kakinoki, Masao Akagi | | European Journal of Histochemistry. 2022; 66(3) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 6 |
A case of osteosarcoma of the mandible treated with surgical resections for pulmonary metastases |
|
| Eri SHIBATA,Kohei OKUYAMA,Yasuyuki MICHI,Kei SAKAMOTO,Hiroyuki HARADA,Tetsuya YODA | | Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 67(6): 353 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 7 |
Curcumin inhibits the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells by targeting the chemerin / CMKLR1 / LCN2 axis |
|
| Yaqiong He,Rongning Wang,Peng Zhang,Jianlong Yan,Nan Gong,Yuhang Li,Shaohong Dong | | Aging. 2021; 13(10): 13859 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 8 |
Novel application of single-cell next-generation sequencing for determination of intratumoral heterogeneity of canine osteosarcoma cell lines |
|
| Jordan Ayers,Rowan J. Milner,Galaxia Cortés-Hinojosa,Alberto Riva,Sandra Bechtel,Bikash Sahay,Matthew Cascio,Amandine Lejeune,Keijiro Shiomitsu,Carlos Souza,Oscar Hernandez,Marc Salute | | Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2021; 33(2): 261 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 9 |
The relationship between the expression of Ki-67 and the prognosis of osteosarcoma |
|
| Ming Zeng,Jian Zhou,Lifang Wen,Yanshan Zhu,Yingquan Luo,Wanchun Wang | | BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 10 |
Is immunotherapy in the future of therapeutic management of sarcomas? |
|
| Ottavia Clemente,Alessandro Ottaiano,Giuseppe Di Lorenzo,Alessandra Bracigliano,Sabrina Lamia,Lucia Cannella,Antonio Pizzolorusso,Massimiliano Di Marzo,Mariachiara Santorsola,Annarosaria De Chiara,Flavio Fazioli,Salvatore Tafuto | | Journal of Translational Medicine. 2021; 19(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 11 |
PRMT5-TRIM21 interaction regulates the senescence of osteosarcoma cells by targeting the TXNIP/p21 axis |
|
| Yu-Hang Li,Kui-Leung Tong,Jun-Lei Lu,Jie-Bin Lin,Zhen-Yan Li,Yuan Sang,Abdelmoumin Ghodbane,Xue-Juan Gao,Man-Seng Tam,Chang-Deng Hu,Huan-Tian Zhang,Zhen-Gang Zha | | Aging. 2020; 12(3): 2507 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 12 |
Osteosarcoma of the jaws: An overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms |
|
| Hélios Bertin,A. Gomez-Brouchet,F. Rédini | | Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2020; 156: 103126 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 13 |
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy for sarcomas: From mechanisms to potential clinical applications |
|
| Pichaya Thanindratarn,Dylan C. Dean,Scott D. Nelson,Francis J. Hornicek,Zhenfeng Duan | | Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2020; 82: 101934 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 14 |
A rare case of a metastatic giant cell-rich osteosarcoma of the mandible: update and differential diagnostic considerations |
|
| Lucas Alves da Mota Santana,Fernanda Aragão Felix,José Alcides Almeida de Arruda,Leorik Pereira da Silva,Érika de Abreu Costa Brito,Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita,Cleverson Luciano Trento | | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2020; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 15 |
Circular RNA_CNST Promotes the Tumorigenesis of Osteosarcoma Cells by Sponging miR-421 |
|
| Ji-Hai Wang, Xue-Jian Wu, Yong-Zhuang Duan, Feng Li | | Cell Transplantation. 2020; 29: 0963689720 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 16 |
Tripartite Motif-Containing 46 Promotes Viability and Inhibits Apoptosis of Osteosarcoma Cells by Activating NF-B Signaling Through Ubiquitination of PPAR |
|
| Wenwei Jiang, Xinyu Cai, Tianyang Xu, Kaiyuan Liu, Dong Yang, Lin Fan, Guodong Li, Xiao Yu | | Oncology Research Featuring Preclinical and Clinical Cancer Therapeutics. 2020; 28(4): 409 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 17 |
SRPX2 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Invasion in Osteosarcoma Through Regulating Hippo Signaling Pathway |
|
| Zhiqiang Wu,Chunmeng Wang,Yong Chen,Zhengwang Sun,Wangjun Yan | | OncoTargets and Therapy. 2020; Volume 13: 1737 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 18 |
Differential Outcomes and Biologic Markers of Radiation-Associated vs. Sporadic Osteosarcoma: A Single-Institution Experience |
|
| Brittany L. Siontis,Jonathan B. McHugh,Emily Roberts,Lily Zhao,Dafydd G. Thomas,Dawn Owen,Laurence H. Baker,J. Sybil Biermann,Scott M. Schuetze,Rashmi Chugh | | Frontiers in Oncology. 2020; 9 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 19 |
Overexpression of miR-335 inhibits the migration and invasion of osteosarcoma by targeting SNIP1 |
|
| Yuanlong Xie,Huaxin Deng,Renxiong Wei,Wenchao Sun,Yongjian Qi,Shiyi Yao,Lin Cai,Yan Wang,Zhouming Deng | | International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 133: 137 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 20 |
Advanced development of ErbB family-targeted therapies in osteosarcoma treatment |
|
| Wei Wang,Hua-fu Zhao,Teng-fei Yao,Hao Gong | | Investigational New Drugs. 2018; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 21 |
Correlation between osteosarcoma and the expression of WWOX and p53 |
|
| Pingtao Liu,Mingyue Wang,Li Li,Tao Jin | | Oncology Letters. 2017; 14(4): 4779 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 22 |
Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 and 3 promote osteosarcoma progression via DHX9 and predict poor patient prognosis |
|
| Dong-dong Cheng,Hui-zhen Zhang,Jun-qing Yuan,Shi-jie Li,Qing-cheng Yang,Cun-yi Fan | | Oncotarget. 2017; 8(16): 26380 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 23 |
Meta-analysis of clinical significance of p53 protein expression in patients with osteosarcoma |
|
| Jie Wu,Ai Guo,Qiang Li,Difan Wang | | Future Oncology. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
 |
|